Allow me to start with an immodest confession - I am a good listener, have been one since quite some time.
Now that it is off my chest, I will proceed with my scholarly discourse on empathy. Yes, I have had a good night's sleep. Yes, I have had too much coffee. I am kidding, there is no such thing as 'too much coffee'.
Nevertheless, here it is.
I listen not only to what is being spoken but also the non-verbal cues like
- How is the spoken word being articulated?
- How measured is the tone?
- Is the body language consonant with the words?
- How important is topic being discussed for the speaker?
- What could the person be feeling about that topic
- Why is this topic being discussed with me?
So, when I write about #empathy, I am on my home ground. I will lay out my opinions on various forms of communication we follow generally:
- Mails – Allows us the most time to adjust tone, flow and meaning of words. Certain words can be emphasized by making them bold, italic, underlined, etc. and combinations thereof. Also, the least spontaneous. Not much to be gleaned about frame of mind of the writer apart from the words you can read
- Chats – Though more impromptu than mails, it can still be controlled by a skilled communicator. Usage of emoticons makes it more expressive though, if you are chatting with someone like me who understands only a few, you run the risk of the other party not getting it. Or worse, explaining those and taking the fun out of it. Good for short interactions. Tests your typing skills as well
- Voice calls – Paraphrasing Lily Tomlin, language was invented to satisfy humankind’s innate need to complain. Humor apart, it is better than the earlier two. It adds a human element, if you are really listening, you can gauge, with certain degree of accuracy, the frame of mind the other person is in. Technology plays an important role here, it could make or mar a call. Participants get easily distracted (having a laptop handy helps too) when the topic being discussed is not of their interest. Have a good laugh at while watching this video.
- Video calls – Better than a voice call, still ranks lower than a personal interaction. You can see the top half of the other party checking out how they look on camera. Facial expressions are visible and can be connected to spoken words to get an overall picture of the speaker’s frame of mind. Limited scope for giving in to distractions since you are visible. Good lighting is essential, no one wants to look ominous with lights directly above the scalp or below the chin.
- Face-to-face interaction – You can listen to the whole person rather than assuming the other parts. However, due to geographically distributed presence of most organizations, it is (almost always) expensive and, hence, not ideal. I prefer this the most. I have realized, folks will freely share their feelings (workload, managers and its ilk) if you let them speak
In one of my earlier organizations, a colleague unloaded her frustrations on me one day. I think she felt better, because she repeated it the next day. Then it became a week, a month, a year. Even after I left that company, she used to call after a hard day. She was polite, asking about my day as well. More interested in honing my listening skills, I would answer with a word or two. Later, we started courting and, in due course, got married and had two beautiful children. Till this day, she maintains, “In addition to listening, you should speak about your day too. Even if it was the most boring routine monotonous vanilla day ever!”
Am I the perfect husband?
I am. But please get a second opinion from my wife, she is always right.
Am I the perfect listener?
I know I am not.
But am I trying to be one?
Indeed.
So, as per Mr. Covey’s much-loved aphorism, try, as much as possible, to listen with the intent to understand. It will make you a good worker.
And a better person.
